Privilege of property

I fi nd the assertion made by Rand Paul and repeated by many in the "tea" movement that the only legitimate functions of government are protection of property, protection of borders and enforcing contracts. They seem to consider these so self evident that they do not justify why these, above all the other rights claimed over history. Some claim a Right such as a "Right to health care" is an obligation on someone else to provide you with this care and is a seizure of power over this person. The Right to own property is exactly the same. A Constablary is established to help you retain/ get back your property, a court system with punishments re-enforces this right. If we are truly responsible for ourselves, why so much support? Every one should be armed and know how to defend themselves. Wealthy people would have to act like they have throughout history and today in much of the world and hire security. I say only wimps need a Nanny State to protect property. I prefer guns and dogs. However health care seems like a reasonable right to have, at least to patch you up after fighting off intruders!